
You buy or use a product — maybe a household chemical, a power tool, or medical device — and it injures you or someone you love. If the product was inherently unsafe or had hidden dangers, you may have a claim under Illinois product liability law. But product liability cases, especially for hazardous or defective products, are complex. You must understand Illinois’s special rules, timelines, burdens of proof, defenses, and procedural steps.
In this post, you will learn:
What kinds of legal theories apply in Illinois for defective or dangerous products
The deadlines, repose periods, and discovery rules you must know
How to build your case: evidence, parties, causation, and damages
Common defenses manufacturers use
What steps to take and how a Chicago personal injury attorney can help
By the end, you’ll have a clearer picture of what your rights are and how to proceed if you’ve been harmed by a hazardous product in Illinois.
In Illinois, product liability refers to legal claims that arise when a product causes harm due to defects or unsafe design. Even if the user misused it a bit, manufacturers or sellers can be held responsible if the product was “unreasonably dangerous.”
Several legal theories allow injured parties to sue for damages. Key ones include:
Strict liability: In Illinois, a manufacturer or seller can be held strictly liable for a defective product without needing to prove negligence. Under this theory, it suffices to prove the product was defective, that it caused injury, and the defect existed when the product left the defendant’s control. Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions reflect that strict liability is imposed without regard to ordinary negligence or privity.
Negligence: You may also claim that the manufacturer, distributor, or seller failed to exercise reasonable care in design, manufacturing, inspection, or warnings.
Breach of warranty: This theory relies on express or implied promises about product safety or performance that are broken.
Sometimes plaintiffs may combine multiple theories in the same lawsuit.
A product may be “defective” in one or more ways:
Design defect: The plan or design of the product is unreasonably dangerous, even if manufactured correctly.
Manufacturing defect: A deviation in how a product was made renders it unsafe.
Failure to warn or inadequate labeling: The product lacked sufficient instructions or warnings about risks.
In Illinois, a product is considered “unreasonably dangerous” under strict liability if it fails the consumer expectation test (beyond ordinary expectations) or the risk-utility test (benefits vs risks).
Illinois has laws that limit when you can bring a product liability claim, no matter how solid your case is:
A statute of repose applies. Under 735 ILCS 5/13-213, product liability actions must, in any event, be brought no later than 12 years after the product was first sold, delivered, or leased by a seller. Alternatively, in some scenarios, the limit is 10 years from first delivery to a non-seller user, whichever is earlier.
The general statute of limitations for product-related personal injury claims is two years from the date of injury (or when you should reasonably have known of the injury). Illinois allows a discovery rule to delay that start in certain cases.
Illinois also provides exceptions and tolling in special circumstances, such as when a product is altered after sale or when the injury was hidden.
Note that the repose period is absolute: even if you discovered your injury late, the repose may bar your case.
Thus, even a strong case can be lost if not filed timely, regardless of how deserving it is.
Here is a guided roadmap to how you or your attorney should proceed when you believe you have a hazardous product claim in Illinois.
From day one, act to preserve evidence because product liability cases depend on lots of technical proof.
Begin by:
Keeping the defective product (don’t throw it away or try to fix it)
Documenting the product’s condition via photos or video immediately
Collecting proof of purchase, serial numbers, manuals, packaging
Retaining all medical records, bills, and reports related to your injuries
Keeping communication with the manufacturer or seller (warranty, recalls, complaints)
Locating and preserving any surveillance, diagrams, lab tests, or expert data
Your attorney can issue a “spoliation” letter to prevent product alteration or destruction.
In a product liability case, liability may lie with more than one entity:
Manufacturer(s)
Designer(s)
Distributors, wholesalers, or retailers
Importers
Suppliers of component parts or raw materials
You and your lawyer must map the chain of distribution to ensure all possible defendants are included—some may be no longer in business, so tracing warranty and sales records is essential.
Depending on circumstances, your case may emphasize strict liability, negligence, or warranty (or all). Your strategy should align with which theory is strongest:
For strict liability, focus on proving unreasonably dangerous condition and causation
For negligence, probe design decisions, testing, inspections, and industry norms
For failure to warn, compare actual warnings vs what a reasonable person would expect
You will need expert witnesses—engineers, safety scientists, medical experts—who can analyze defects, causation, and whether alternate safer designs were feasible.
Your attorney must file the complaint in court before the earliest of:
The two-year statute of limitations
The repose deadline (12 years from first sale or 10 years from first use)
Any alternate deadlines created by special rules or prior disclaimers
In Illinois, there are also special rules for altered products: if a product was modified after sale, a plaintiff may have a separate claim against the party responsible for the alteration, provided it is brought within applicable limits and the plaintiff shows the alteration introduced a hazard.
Your attorney must also guard against dismissal motions (for example, motions saying your expert is unqualified or that the case is barred by repose or limitations).
After filing, each side exchanges:
Depositions (especially of experts)
Documents, design records, test data
Interrogatories and requests for admissions
Your expert reports will lay out:
How the defect existed initially
How it caused your injury
What safer alternative might have prevented it
What warnings should have existed
Be prepared for the defense to attack your experts’ credentials, methodology, assumptions, or data.
Many product liability cases settle, but the threat of trial must be credible. At trial, your experts may testify, provide demonstrative exhibits or simulations, and cross-examination will test their reasoning. Jurors decide whether the product was defective, whether the defect caused injury, what damages apply, and whether any defenses apply.
Your lawyer must be prepared to rebut arguments about misuse, assumption of risk, compliance with regulations, or intervening causes.
Q: Can I file a product liability lawsuit if I used the product in a way not intended?
Possibly. The defense may argue “misuse,” but if that misuse was foreseeable or the manufacturer should have warned against it, you may still recover.
Q: What if the injury appears long after I bought the product?
Illinois allows a discovery rule so that the two-year limitations may begin when you reasonably should have discovered the injury. But the absolute repose deadline still applies.
Q: What defenses do manufacturers commonly raise?
They often argue:
The product was not defective when sold
The defect did not cause your injury
You misused the product
You assumed the risk
Your expert’s methodology is flawed
The repose or limitations period expired
Q: Do I need an expert witness?
Yes. Product liability cases almost always require expert testimony to explain technical defects, causation, and alternative designs.
Q: What damages can I recover?
You may seek compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost income, future medical costs, and sometimes punitive damages if the conduct was especially reckless.
In Illinois, hazardous product liability cases are high-stakes and technically complex. Strong claims require careful preservation of evidence, timely action within strict deadlines, multiple legal theories, and credible expert testimony. Even the repose deadlines can cut off your opportunity regardless of how compelling your case is.
If you’ve been harmed by a dangerous product, don’t wait. A Chicago personal injury attorney experienced with product liability can help you evaluate your rights, identify responsible parties, and build a strong case to protect your claim before time runs out.

The Law Offices of John A. Culver offers over 3 decades of legal experience defending and prosecuting civil actions on behalf of a variety of clients, including numerous jury trials.